English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the face of the immobility of the United Nations system, various forms of justifications to the current military interventions have been formulated, being the Human Rights discourse one of the main sources of legitimacy. It is proposed in the present work to discuss such theoretical justifications, with a view to determining whether there is a legitimation before the International Community. The role of the General Assembly of the United Nations and the possibility of its action in the conflict based on the theory of the implicit powers is also problematic. In light of the immobility of the Security Council, it is said that the General Assembly has the implicit prerogative to act. A bibliographical survey is carried out on the subject, using the hypothetical deductive method, resulting in a study on the legitimacy discourses in the case of Syria.

A proteção dos Direitos Humanos como discurso de legitimação: a limitação do Direito Internacional no caso da Síria