English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Clinical decisions should be evidence informed; that is, best practise requires a combination of evidence and clinical expertise. The discussion that follows posits that Equality and Human Rights legislation and subsequent jurisprudence is a body of knowledge occupational therapists should use to enhance evidence-informed decision making in workplace interventions, particularly in assisting with the legal obligations for the duty to accommodate. “Human Rights legislation applies to employers, unions, and employees in the public and private sector and it may take precedence over other legislation” [1, p. 827].

Understanding legislation and case law – Evidence informed decision-making for Canadian occupational therapists in workplace-based practise