English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Upper extremity insults caused by single stress or by repetitive microtrauma occur in a large variety of sport or professional activities [1,3,21,22,24,32]. Among these injuries, lateral epicondylitis could result from excessive use of the wrist extensor and forearm supinator muscles [7,12–14,27]. Isokinetics has been increasingly used for strength measurement of muscle groups with tendon disorders with the aim of interpreting the mechanical profile of the muscle and to assess treatment effects [7,15,16]. Dynamometers also allow eccentric training in patients with chronic tendinitis [7,17,34]. Nevertheless, the ability to accurately assess muscular strength in testing situations appears fundamental and normative data remain vital in order to interpret pathological cases, particularly of a unilateral type [25,28,30,31]. Relatively little is known about isokinetic profiles of the wrist muscles. Kramer et al. [26] examined the reliability of isometric pronation and supination measurements using two dynamometers. Friedman [15] compared isokinetic peak torques in symptomatic and asymptomatic lateral epicondyles of women using a single speed test protocol (concentric 120◦.s−1 mode). Frobose et al. [16] tested the wrist extensors and flexors in the concentric mode. Nevertheless, no comprehensive isokinetic assessment of the forearm and wrist muscles (in the concentric and eccentric modes through

Isokinetic assessment of the forearm and wrist muscles