English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Verbal probability expressions are quite intuitive and used in a variety of clinical important issues like adverse drug causality appraisal. However, there is insufficient evidence of their numerical meaning and whether they have a linear or logistic relationship with them. We aimed at contributing to answering these questions by means of a comparative regression analysis based on a sample of N=683 participants between 10 and 82 years (mean age 20.33±11.77; median: 18 years) who were asked to numerically rate a given set of sixteen verbal probability phrases on a visual analogue scale. With respect to the explained variance, we found an R2 for the linear model of 0.574 while R2 for the logistic model was only 0.392 indicating a superiority of linear model compared to the logistic model. Although we were able to show that ranked verbal phrases are more likely to behave in a linear that in a logistic way other regression options like the double logistic model should be taken into consideration for further research.

Verbal Probabilities: Linear or Logistic? - A Regression Analysis Approach