English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Clinical coding is done using ICD-10-AM (International Classification of Diseases, version 10, Australian Modification) and ACHI (Australian Classification of Health Interventions) in acute and sub-acute hospitals in Australia for funding, insurance claims processing and research. The task of assigning a code to an episode of care is a manual process. This has posed challenges due to increase set of codes, the complexity of care episodes, and large training and recruitment costs of clinical coders. Use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques is considered as a solution to this problem. This paper carries out a comparative analysis on a selected set of NLP and ML techniques to identify the most efficient algorithm for clinical coding based on a set of standard metrics: precision, recall, F-score, accuracy, Hamming loss and Jaccard similarity.

Comparative Analysis of Algorithmic Approaches for Auto-Coding with ICD-10-AM and ACHI.