English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

BACKGROUNDThe development processes of data exchange standards for use in healthcare are very different from those used in clinical research. Healthcare data standards are traditionally developed by the Health Level 7 (HL7) organization, whereas those for use in clinical research are mostly developed by the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium. No alignment of these standards has so far taken place.OBJECTIVESDue to the increasing use of electronic health records as primary source in clinical research, it becomes necessary to align these standards, not only the semantic standards, but also the data exchange standards (formats) themselves.METHODSMutual feature gaps between ODM and FHIR are investigated.RESULTSA transition path how the HL7-FHIR standard and the CDISC-ODM transport standard can grow into a single standard for use both in healthcare and in clinical research is presented.

Towards a Single Data Exchange Standard for Use in Healthcare and in Clinical Research