English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The increase in generation of, and access to, public health and epidemiology data necessitates robust mechanisms to produce data documentation metadata. Metadata often describes research data and the process through which the data was collected. Secondary use of clinical data sourced from electronic health records can greatly benefit from access to metadata and other such documentation. However, metadata quality assessments often fail to form a routine part of metadata administration. The aim of this work is to review different methods of metadata quality assessment and improve understanding of current practices in public health and epidemiology research.

Improving metadata quality assessment in public health and epidemiology