English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper we compare two types of corpus, focusing on the lexical ambiguity of each of them. The first corpus consists mainly of general newspaper articles and literature excerpts, while the second belongs to the medical domain. To conduct the study, we have used two different disambiguation tools. First, each tool was validated in its respective application area. We then use these systems in order to assess and compare both the general ambiguity rate and the particularities of each domain. Quantitative results show that medical documents are lexically less ambiguous than unrestricted documents. Our conclusions emphasize the importance of the application area in the design of NLP tools.

Comparing General and Medical Texts for Information Retrieval Based on Natural Language Processing: An Inquiry into Lexical Disambiguation