English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Initiation and propagation of ductile fractures are a major consideration during the design of high-pressure pipelines. Consequences of a pipeline failure can be catastrophic thus structural integrity must be ensured over several decades. Traditional lab-scale experiments such as the Charpy V-Notch (CVN) and Drop Weight Tear Test (DWTT), impact experiments on a notched three-point bending sample, are widely used to measure the fracture toughness of a material. However, with increasing wall thickness and the transition to high-grade steels in the pipeline industry, the size-effect of the specimen and inverse fracture became prominent issues. A new testing methodology called the Dynamic Tensile Tear Test (DT3) is currently investigated as to address the issues presented by the current state of the art. In this study, a numerical investigation is conducted on the CVN, DWTT and DT3 experiments to compare the modelling of dynamic ductile fracture propagation in three different testing scales using the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) damage model. X70 and X100 pipeline steel grades are used to model material behaviour. For each considered lab-scale experiment, the dynamic ductile fracture behaviour was successfully reproduced using the GTN damage model.

Numerical modelling of dynamic ductile fracture propagation in different lab-scale experiments using GTN damage model