English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Large-scale fire fighting was investigated, including a comparison between high-pressure and low-pressure manual fire fighting systems and measurements of heat stress on fire fighters. Six tests were performed in a room measuring 14.0 × 7.7 m². The fuel in each test consisted of wooden pallets arranged in 6 stacks with 13 pallets in each stack. Weight loss, gas temperature, heat radiation and room pressure were measured. The nozzle pressures were 7 bar and 25 bar and the flow rates were 1.92, 3.83 and 5.75 kg/s. The tests showed that the ability to reach the burning fuel with water limits the capacity of the fire-fighting attack. The high-pressure system proved more efficient than the low-pressure system. It gave a faster response and required a lower flow to attain the same extinction effect as the low-pressure system.

Fire Tests in a Large Hall, Using Manually Applied High- and Low-Pressure Water Sprays