English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolExiste un consenso hegemonico sobre los beneficios de la democracia, sin embargo, desde sus origenes helenicos hasta la actualidad, no faltan autores que se han dedicado a identificar las falencias de este modelo politico. Esta investigacion tiene por objetivo revelar algunas de las criticas valiosas efectuadas a la democracia. Con este proposito, se seleccionan dialogicamente diferentes autores ubicados en distintos contextos temporales e ideologicos y se hace un tratamiento hermeneutico-dialogico de sus argumentos. En lo metodologico se trata, en consecuencia, de una investigacion de tipo hermeneutica con base a fuentes documentales impresas sustentada en una epistemologia postpositivista. Se concluye que, en su doble condicion de constructo teorico (ideal democratico) y experiencia historica concreta la democracia o, mejor dicho, las poliarquias, son formas de gobierno en todo momento perfectibles y susceptibles a un tratamiento critico para descubrir sus contradicciones, limitaciones y ambiguedades. En este sentido, el aporte fundamental de la investigacion radica en impulsar los espacios dialogicos sobre la democracia y sus desafios historicos, desde la relectura de obras cumbres de la ciencia politica y la filosofia politica. EnglishThere is a hegemonic consensus about the benefits of democracy, however, from its Hellenic origins to the present, there’s some authors who have dedicated themselves to identifying the shortcomings of this political model. This research aims to reveal some of the valuable criticisms made to democracy. For this purpose, different authors located in different temporal and ideological contexts are selected dialogically and a hermeneutic-dialogic treatment of their arguments is made. In methodological terms, it is, consequently, a hermeneutic research based on printed documentary sources based on a postpositivist epistemology. It is concluded that, in its double condition of theoretical construct (democratic ideal) and concrete historical experience, democracy or, rather, polyarchies, are perfectible forms of government the most of the time and at the same time susceptible to a critical treatment to discover their contradictions, limitations and ambiguities. In this sense, the fundamental contribution of this research lies in promoting dialogic spaces on democracy and its historical challenges, from the rereading of top works about political science and political philosophy.

Democracia a la palestra: ¿Gobierno del pueblo o degeneración del poder?