English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We owe much to H. C. Fleming, M. L. Bender, and M. Lamberti for their pioneering studies in Omotic lexical comparison and reconstruction. The latter two authors even managed to come up with a few monographs on the subject (Bender 1975, 1999, 2003, Lamberti 1993, Lamberti and Sottile 1997). Still, this language branch arguably represents the least cultivated field within the immense Afro-Asiatic domain from the viewpoint of systematic etymological elaboration of the inherited Afro-Asiatic lexical treasures. To the best of my knowledge, the only special study devoted to a systematic treatment of Omotic/Afro-Asiatic matches is the unpublished paper presented by V. Blažek at the 2nd International Symposium on Cushitic and Omotic Languages (Torino, November 1989). This kind of research has already brought considerable progress in other branches of the vast Afro-Asiatic language macrofamily (Semitic, Egyptian, Berber, Cushitic, Chadic). The abundant results in Semito-Egyptian linguistic comparison are well-known and are due to some two centuries’ efforts (cf. EDE I 1–8). The Afro-Asiatic background of the Berber root inventory has been investigated in special studies by O. Rössler (1952, 1964), A. Militarev (1991), and most recently by myself in a series of papers entitled ‘Some Berber etymologies’ (Takács 2011 with a list of previous parts). Materials for an etymological dictionary of Bedawye (North Cushitic) have been collected and partially published by V. Blažek (1990 MS, 1994 MS, 2000 MS, 2003, 2006), whereas D. Appleyard (2006) has most recently concluded his Agaw (Central Cushitic) comparative lexicon. A. Dolgopolsky examined in 1983 the Semitic matches of East Cushitic roots, in 1988 the word-initial laryngeals and pharyngeals in Semitic vs. East Cushitic, and, in 1987, the South Cushitic laterals as compared to Semitic. Regular phonological and lexical correspondences between South Cushitic and Afro-Asiatic have been established by myself (Takács 1999, 2000, 2010). Numerous works by H. Jungraithmayr (e.g., JI 1994 I), O. Stolbova (e.g., 1996 or CLD I–III), and myself (e.g., in my diverse series like ‘Angas-Sura etymologies’1, the one on North

Omotic lexicon in its Afro-Asiatic setting III: Omotic *p-