English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In his 'Tractatus logico-philosophicus', Ludwig Wittgenstein declares that he has solved Russell's paradox. He presents the solution in a prima facie simple formula "(∃φ) : F(φu) . φu = Fu". This solution is disregarded both by the Russellians and most Wittgensteinians. In this paper I try to read the above formula and translate it into a class membership language (CML). I show that this formula contradicts Russell's logic. I investigate and compare the different forms of this formula in Wittgenstein's manuscripts and in the different editions of the 'Tractatus'. I also take a look at the different interpretations of this formula in literature. My position is that Wittgenstein created his own transcendental logic that can show self-referential (reflexive) sentences without reflexivity.

WITTGENSTEIN’S TRACTATUS 3.333 AND RUSSELL’S PARADOX