English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The pericope in Mark 1:40-45 portrays the healing of the leper. A majority of manuscripts of the Gospel use the participle σπλαγχνισθeίς in Mark 1,41 to describe Jesus as “moved by compassion”. Nevertheless, there are other versions of the text, including Codex Bezae, which contain a different reading of this participle, namely as ὀργισθeίς, which would characterize Jesus as overwhelmed with anger. Faced with this glaring discrepancy, one needs to decide which version is more appropriate from the point of view of textual criticism. This article discusses both possibilities and attempts to provide the most fitting solution. External criticism of this text (based on the assumption that no scribal error occurred), especially arguments stemming from its internal analysis, bring us to the conclusion that the reading ὀργισθeίς characterizing Jesus as overwhelmed with anger, is most credible.

Jezus „zdjęty litością” czy „ogarnięty gniewem”? Analiza Mk 1,41 w świetle argumentów z krytyki tekstu