English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We would like to thank Rouchaud et al for their study entitled “Nonaneurysmal Perimesencephalic Hemorrhage Is Associated with Deep Cerebral Venous Drainage Anomalies: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.” This is a timely effort to investigate the underlying mechanisms of bleeding in nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (pSAH) because no known causes for this condition have been established yet. However, we raise a few concerns regarding this article. Deep cerebral venous anomalies may be more common in patients with pSAH, but the meta-analysis does not prove their guilt beyond association. Higher rates of a primitive venous system may be seen in patients with pSAH, but it is not clear how the authors concluded that it has the potential to facilitate the diagnosis of pSAH. Are the authors advocating performing digital subtraction angiography to assess the venous anatomy in patients with SAH in the distribution typical for SAH? As per the literature, patients with nonaneurysmal SAH may have a normal bilateral basal vein of Rosenthal (BVR) drainage pattern (18.3%), and an abnormal venous drainage pattern can be seen in patients with aneurysmal SAH (15.3%). It is unclear how detecting the venous anatomy would change management or prognosis in patients with nonaneurysmal pSAH. The available current literature indicates that negative findings on CT angiography are conclusive in most cases in excluding an aneurysm as the source of SAH in patients with a typical distribution pattern of pSAH, and these patients generally have good outcomes. Recurrent pSAH is rarely reported, and primitive venous drainage has been noted in recurrent pSAH as well. However, even the few reported cases of recurrent pSAH have been reported to have a good outcome with no clear explanation for the etiology of the bleed. Not all studies have found an association between variant venous anatomy and pSAH. Variants in venous anatomy are also much more common than the incidence of pSAH. Although intracranial venous congestion caused by straining in patients with anomalous venous drainage has been hypothesized to cause a tear in the vein fixed to a dural sinus, Song et al found physical actions, including breath-holding during coughing, shouting, and ejaculation, in only 30% of instances of nonaneurysmal SAH in their series. Performing conventional angiography after negative findings on CTA may not be cost-effective and is not without risks. We request that the authors elaborate on how a primitive BVR pattern might affirm the diagnosis of nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic hemorrhage and the utility of looking for it, in the absence of better evidence and based solely on association.

american journal of neuroradiology

Concerning “Nonaneurysmal Perimesencephalic Hemorrhage Is Associated with Deep Cerebral Venous Drainage Anomalies: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis”