English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the management of brainstem lesions, the place of stereotactic biopsy sampling remains debatable. The authors compared the results of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, positron emission tomography (PET), and histological findings obtained in 30 patients who underwent an MR image– and PET-guided stereotactic biopsy procedure for a brainstem mass lesion.  Between July 1991 and December 1998, 30 patients harboring a brainstem mass lesion underwent a stereotactic procedure in which combined MR imaging and PET guidance was used. Positron emission tomography scanning was performed using [ 18 F]-fluorodeoxyglucose in 16 patients, methionine in two patients, and with both tracers in 12 patients. Definite diagnosis was established on histological examination of the biopsy samples. Interpretation of MR imaging findings only or PET findings only were in agreement with the histological diagnosis in 63% and 73% of cases, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging and PET findings were concordant in 19 of the 30 cases; in those cases, imaging data correlated with histological findings in 79%. In seven patients who underwent one PET-defined and one MR imaging–defined trajectory, at histological examination the PET-guided samples were more representative of the tumor's nature and grade than the MR imaging–guided samples in four cases (57%). In 18 patients PET scanning was used to define a biopsy target and provided a diagnostic yield in 100% of the cases.  Although the use of combined PET and MR imaging improves radiological interpretation of a mass lesion in the brainstem, it does not accurately replace histological diagnosis that is provided by a stereotactically obtained biopsy sample. Combined information provided by MR imaging and PET in stereotactic conditions improves the accuracy of targeting and the diagnostic yield of the stereotactically biopsy sample; an MR imaging– and PET-guided stereotactic biopsy procedure is a safe and efficient modality for the management of mass lesions of the brainstem.

neurosurgical focus

Combined magnetic resonance imaging– and positron emission tomography–guided stereotactic biopsy in brainstem mass lesions: diagnostic yield in a series of 30 patients