English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

BACKGROUND  Pelvic deformity after resection of malignant pelvic tumors causes scoliosis. Although the central sacral vertical line (CSVL) is often used to evaluate the coronal alignment and determine the treatment strategy for scoliosis, it is not clear whether the CSVL is a suitable coronal reference axis in cases with pelvic deformity. This report proposes a new coronal reference axis for use in cases with pelvic deformity and discusses the pathologies of spinal deformity remaining after revision surgery.    OBSERVATIONS  A 14-year-old boy who had undergone internal hemipelvectomy and pelvic ring reconstruction 2 years prior was referred to our hospital with severe back pain. His physical and radiographic examinations revealed severe scoliosis with pelvic deformity. The authors planned a surgical strategy based on the CSVL and performed pelvic ring reconstruction using free vascularized fibula graft and spinopelvic fixation from L5 to the pelvis. After the procedure, although the patient’s back pain was relieved, his scoliosis persisted. At the latest follow-up, his spinal deformity correction was acceptable with corset bracing. Therefore, the authors did not perform additional surgeries.    LESSONS  The CSVL may not be appropriate for evaluating coronal alignment in cases with pelvic deformity. Accurate preoperative planning is required to correct spinal deformities with pelvic deformity.

Remaining spine deformity after revision surgery for pelvic reconstruction and spinopelvic fixation: illustrative case