English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Mujahid Hussain, Amna Niazi and Kanwal Iqbal Khan 390 Global Social Sciences Review (GSSR) Authoritative-Integrated Style Transformational-Integrated Style Task-oriented, Authoritative, Coercive, Visionary, Transactional, Initiating structure, Achievement-oriented. Transformational, Tolerant, Affiliative, Coaching, Shared, Servant, Supportive, Consideration, Authentic and Integrity styles. Pacesetting-Integrated Style Democratic-Integrated Style Pacesetting, Directing. Selling, Democratic, Team Oriented, Participative, Consultative and LMX styles. Figure 1: TAPD Leadership Styles Model In the case of this study, the only exception to this model is the transactional style which is more commonly practised and discussed style as compared to pacesetting style. Hussain, et al, (2016) also studied the impact of the four basic styles upon employees’ performance, but they did not consider the situational variables. We feel that the research should be taken a step forward and study situational variables of the newly developed model. Various leadership approaches describe the situation in different terms. This study takes into consideration the stages of OLC to describe the situational dimension of leadership effectiveness.

Interplay of Leadership Styles, Employees' Performance and Organizational Life Cycle