English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

For immigration authorities, the goal of asylum hearings is to differentiatebetween economic migrants and legitimate political asylum seekers. However,in the stories asylum seekers tell, these categories often blur. Nevertheless, theasylum process uses this differentiation to conceal inequities in the system, andto justify denials. This article examines political asylum as a transnational andculturally local process and argues that contradictions between protection andcontrol underlie some of the seemingly absurd denials of asylum applications.

Contradictory Discourses of Protection and Control in Transnational Asylum Law