English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Accreditation of higher education in the United States dates a long way back, in comparison to the rest of the world. Since the approval of the G.I. Bill in 1952, accreditation has played a major role in regulating higher education. It has had a direct impact on the possibilities of obtaining public funding for educational institutions. The purpose, scope, methodology and result of accreditation processes have not always been understood and have given rise to conflicts that have ended up in court. This study reviews United States jurisprudence in a series of cases –mainly brought before federal courts– between accreditation agencies and higher education institutions. The paper aims to examine the principles to be drawn from the experience of United States courts which, under their laws and regulations, contribute to a fair relationship among agencies and educational institutions in matters involving accreditation.

Acreditación de la educación superior en Estados Unidos: el juicio de los tribunales