English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The present study aimed to investigate whether two experiential avoidance measures, the AAQ-II and na IRAP, would predict the participant’s performance during an avoidance task. The procedure consisted of three phases: (1) answering questionnaires (including the AAQ-II); (2) responding an IRAP developed to assess EE; (3) responding to an avoidance test. Data collection was individualized. Adult participants composed two groups depending on their performance on the final task: Avoidance=0 (participants who did not emit any avoidance response during the test; n = 17) and Avoidance>2 (participants who emitted at least three avoidance responses; n = 18). There was no difference between groups regarding the AAQ-II scores. On the other hand, participants from the group Avoidance>2 responded faster to “true” on those IRAP trials that presented phases related to avoiding negative private events – compared to the group Avoidance=0. The effect of relational responding on the occurrence of EA is discussed.

Utilizando o AAQ-II e o IRAP para prever a ocorrência de esquiva experiencial