English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The ischaemic lesion due to coarctation of the aorta, inadequate myocardial protection, cardioplegic solutions, hypothermia and other factors can contribute to alterations in the myocardial contractility in the postsurgical period of valve replacement.Objective: To determine the efficacy of Levosimendan vs. Dobutamine in the treatment of ventricular dysfunction in patients subjected to aortic valve replacement.Materials and Methods: Quasi-experimental research was carried out on 60 patients diagnosed with stenosis, insufficiency or double aortic lesion subjected to aortic valve replacement under general anaesthesia. Cohorts were randomly assigned, group I (n=30) Dobutamine at 7.5 μg/kg/min, and group II (n=30) Levosimendan infusion of 0.2 μg/kg/min. The following criteria were monitored in both groups arterial tension, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and the hemodynamic variables with central venous catheter 7 Fr Arrow and Swan Ganz catheter 7Fr Edwards via internal jugular. For the statistical analysis, the variables were analysed using the student’s t-test P&lt;0.05.Results: The average age was 57.02±13 years. The average dose was 3-5 gammas for Dobutamine and 0.1-0.2 gammas for Levosimendan. The left ventricular ejection fractions were 56.2±11% and 56.4±10%, respectively. In the postsurgical setting, significant differences were observed only in the capillary pressure (17.03±5.8 vs. 13.87±2.9 cmH2O, p&lt;0.01). The Levosimendan group (64.1±13.6 vs. 57.6±12.9%, p=0.06).Conclusion: The administration of Levosimendan during the perioperative aortic valve replacement was associated with a tendency of deterioration of the ejection fraction in the left ventricle compared to the use of Dobutamine.

Efficacy of Levosimendan vs. Dobutamine in the Treatment of Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients Subjected to Aortic Valve Replacement