English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolEn medio de dinamicas cambiantes como es el caso de las relaciones entre Estados Unidos y China, las politicas interna y exterior del nuevo gobierno de Corea del Sur bajo el presidente Moon Jae-in se han mostrado favorables a China y Corea del Norte, de forma algo contraria a las politicas mantenidas por las administraciones anteriores que fueron politicas pro-americanas. Esta situacion es muy similar a las circunstancias geopoliticas de la dinastia Joseon durante finales del siglo XIX y principios del XX antes de que Corea fuera ocupada por Japon. Este articulo analiza y compara las situaciones geopoliticas y las politicas internas y exteriores de Corea en los dos periodos y sostiene que los responsables politicos deberian ser mas prudentes al deliberar sobre lo que deberia conseguirse para mejorar el futuro de Corea, en lugar de tratar de garantizar su propio legado personal o su ambicion por el poder politico. EnglishUnder changing dynamics such as US-China relations, the domestic and foreign policies of South Korea’s new government under President Moon Jae-in have shown favor to China and North Korea, which is somewhat contrary to previous administrations that maintained pro-American policies. This situation is very similar to the geopolitical circumstances of the Joseon Dynasty during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries before Korea was occupied by Japan. This article analyzes and compares the geopolitical situations and Korea’s domestic and foreign policies of the two periods. By doing so, this article argues that policy makers should be more prudent when deliberating what should be achieved in order to enhance the future of Korea, rather than how to ensure their own personal legacy or ambition for political power.

Has the Ghost that Ruined the Country Been Resurrected? The Puzzle of South Korea’s Domestic and Foreign Policies