English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This is a comment on the recent paper “Phase Transformation in CuAu and Cu 3 Au: A Comparison between Calorimetric and Resistometric Measurements” published in this journal [ 1 ]. This is a careful study, but a few comments seem however to be in order, particularly concerning the structural states of the AuCu samples, which can present three phases. Use is made of some unpublished results of electron microscopy observations while temperature is varied in situ. The accent is put on the necessity of a precise characterisation of the structural state prior to any heating or cooling. Some possible bearings on the profile of transition peaks obtained in calorimetry or resistometry are investigated.

Comment on the Article: Phase Transformations in CuAu and Cu 3 Au