English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This short article presents a simple case of failure, from a materials engineering point of view. One may therefore ask what makes it worth publishing. The inclined reader, though, will notice the somewhat surprising nature of the macroscopic damage pattern. The type of defect reported in the context of the first examination of the component, which had to be performed non-destructively, was therefore wrong. This is an example of the risk of misinterpretation in cases where the customer dictates how the examination is carried out that all those working in the field of damage analysis are aware of. It also demonstrates that using the scanning electron microscope is not a luxury, not even in the manufacturing control, as some damage patterns cannot be elucidated without using this device that has revolutionized the component failure analysis.

Component Loss due to the Fracture of an Indexable Insert