English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

There is international consensus that for the various nuclear Advanced Reactor Concepts (ARCs), which are currently under development, design and operational safety goals as well as modern review frameworks for risk assessment required for licensing related decision-making shall be developed. The objective of this paper is to screen information available from different countries and international organisations on such efforts as far as they consider the use of Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) or specific probabilistic evaluations. The screening of available information is done for many different types of ARCs (so-called Generation III, III+ and IV), including either active, passive or both types of systems. Main conclusion is that very little information is available for full probabilistic assessments, only recently some activities started on partial probabilistic evaluations, such as on the reliability of certain types of passive systems. Therefore, published statements on significantly lower risk levels achieved by certain ARCs are at least not verifiable.

Current use of probabilistic safety evaluations for advanced reactor concepts