English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Le present article revisite les donnees recueillies dans le cadre d’une recherche anterieure conduite par Hurteau et Houle (2008). A l’epoque, les chercheurs n’avaient pas ete en mesure de detailler la contribution des competences personnelles de l’evaluateur au pilotage d’une evaluation dont les resultats sont acceptables pour les parties prenantes et d’en effectuer une analyse exhaustive, faute d’un cadre theorique adequat. En introduisant le concept de sagesse pratique, House (2015) leur offre l’opportunite de le faire. Cet auteur definit le concept comme « …doing the right thing in the special circumstances of performing the job» (p. 88). De plus, Schwartz et Sharpe (2010) offrent des criteres qui permettent d’en etablir la presence. La demarche actuelle a consiste a analyser le temoignage d’un policier d’experience. Les resultats ont permis de bonifier notre comprehension du concept, tout en soulignant la contribution du Telos (valeurs morales) ainsi que de criteres supplementaires, tels que l’importance d’un temps de reflexion et la necessite de completer les informations lorsque cela s’avere necessaire. This article revisits data collected during previous research conducted by Hurteau and Houle (2008). At the time, the researchers were not able to account for the evaluator’s personal skills to pilot an evaluation, the results of which were acceptable to the stakeholders, and to conduct a comprehensive analysis, for lack of an appropriate theoretical framework. By introducing the concept of practical wisdom, House (2015) offers them the opportunity to do so. The author defines this concept as “… doing the right thing in the special circumstances of performing the job” (p. 88). In addition, Schwartz and Sharpe (2010) offer criteria used to establish its presence. The current approach consisted of analyzing the testimony of an experienced police officer. The results helped to improve our understanding of the concept, highlighting the contribution of Telos (moral values) as well as additional criteria such as the importance of time for reflection and the need to supplement the information where necessary.

L’évaluateur et la sagesse pratique : vecteurs essentiels pour assurer la crédibilité de l’évaluation