English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Sitting in prison, a bitter and broken Oscar Wilde came to lament that he had ever met the bewitching Lord Alfred Douglas. He characterised their friendship as the single cause of the destruction of his life and reputation. (1) While there is some truth to this, it was ultimately not Alfred Douglas who brought down Oscar Wilde, but his father John Sholto Douglas, the eighth Marquis of Queensberry. (2) It was this man who instigated Oscar Wilde's very public humiliation; Wilde could only lament the irony "that it was by a pariah that I was to be made a pariah myself." (3) Queensberry was a peculiar character in nineteenth-century Britain; he was famous both for his outlandish behaviour and his incessant desire for that behaviour to be known. Any other father anxious about the unsavoury company of his son might have tried quietly to break the connection, or at least tried to limit the publicity about it. Instead, Queensberry blustered and threatened and did everything he could to create a scandal, daring Wilde to bring the matter to the courts. Here Queensberry set his trap and unleashed accusations and evidence that brought Wilde's (and by implication his own son's) private sexuality under public scrutiny over the course of three sensational trials. (4) This action was not an isolated incident, but the pattern of a man who sought controversy and conflict at every turn in his adult life. Queensberry made himself an outsider among his peers because his behaviour was notorious in the truest sense of the terra: it was outrageous and it was well-known. Victorian high society had certain rules of conduct and even more stringent rules of discretion; to transgress either was to risk social death. Queensberry made a career out of courting public scandal. Extraordinary individuals such as the Marquis of Queensberry make for fascinating subjects of biography, and yet that very characteristic makes it complicated to deduce social norms or typical values from their lives. (5) Queensberry's life was neither representative nor reflective of most Victorians' ideal of an aristocratic gentleman. In many ways his life is a case study in what a gentleman was not supposed to be, as he set about flouting every social convention conceivable. Yet this Scottish peer was not the only nobleman who failed to live up to the highest Victorian moral standards; in private circles there were many eccentric aristocrats who defied social mores. (6) His life reminds us that the veneer of Victorian respectability could be thin. Men who quietly flouted morality were accepted, or at least tolerated, within polite society. (7) However, there was nothing quiet about the "scarlet" Marquis; indeed, he went out of his way to have his unconventional behaviour noticed, and his status as a gentleman questioned. (8) All aristocrats were by definition gentlemen by way of their birth. (9) Well into the 1870s, the British aristocracy and landed gentry maintained an unconcealed grip on the bulk of the nation's wealth, power, and status. (10) Traditional concepts of the gentleman had grown out of the lifestyle of aristocrats, whose birth entitled them to political and economic power,u Defining and redefining appropriate gentlemanly conduct was part of the continuing evolution of elite manners and morals. (12) The nineteenth century gentleman ideally embodied a mythical blend of good blood and impeccable training, with his dedication to a life of service and power making him the epitome of "disinterested" governance. (13) The idea of gentlemanly behaviour was flexible and fluid, characteristics that encouraged new aspirants and contributed to its survival well into the nineteenth century. These new gentlemen of the middle classes, however, had different concerns. (14) Historians need to be careful not to conflate the very real social and cultural distinctions that differentiated aristocratic and bourgeois ideas of masculinity and gentlemanliness. (15) How the patrician classes characterized appropriate behaviour for their members through the term "gentleman" was quite distinct from middle class attempts to cement the status of a "gentleman. …

Queensberry’s Misrule: Reputation, Celebrity, and the Idea of the Victorian Gentleman