English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Recent scholarship on Indigenous politics has illuminated the complex entanglements of science, bureaucracy, social movements and cosmological practices that tend to occur wherever Indigenous practices meet modern environmental management. These studies have shown how the powerful operations of science and bureaucracy, instantiating Western ontology, have eliminated Indigenous ontologies from public arenas such as those of policy-making. The reductive power of a modern ontology that assumes a “one-world world,” to borrow John Law's (2011) word, is abundantly visible in these ethnographies of ontological encounters. Focusing on some nineteenth-century Thai episodes, occurring at the time when the modern one-world world was still being constructed in the form of new scientific infrastructures of observation, this article examines some of the ontological consequences of these encounters.

In between the Cosmos and “Thousand-Cubed Great Thousands Worlds”: Composition of Uncommon Worlds by Alexander von Humboldt and King Mongkut