English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Bl Introduction Bl Background Bl Terminology B3 Purpose and scope B3 Description of study area B4 Acknowledgments B7 Methods B7 Overview B7 Procedure descriptions B7 Litter-fall sampling at study plots B7 Other data from study plots B8 Analysis of litter fall BIO Leaf decomposition B12 Extrapolation to the entire flood plain B13 Results B13 Litter fall B13 Species and communities B13 Annual litter production B14 Leaf fall per stem biomass B14 Forest-type differences B16 Seasonal variability B17 Annual variability B18 Nutrient content B19 Evaluation of sampling design B20 Leaf decomposition B20 Flood-plain litter-fall estimates B29 Discussion B30 Methodology B30 Annual variability B31 Sample loss B31 Seasonal patterns B32 Factors influencing litter-fall production B32 Species B32 Canopy cover B33 Tree abundance and density B33 Diversity B33 Leaf decomposition B35 Litter-fall comparisons with other systems B36 Litter fall as a nutrient and detritus source B37 Summary B38 References cited B39 Supplementary data Daily litter production rate of major species B41 Conversion factors B42

Production and decomposition of forest litter fall on the Apalachicola River flood plain, Florida: Chapter B, Apalachicola River quality assessment