English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

1 Discussion 1 Data Presentation 1 References Cited2 Figures 1–4. Maps showing— 1. Weighted average sulfur content of bituminous coal that was mined in the Appalachian basin for electrical power generation for 1983 through 1995 6 2. Weighted average sulfur content of bituminous coal that was mined in the Appalachian basin for electrical power generation for 1996 through 2005 7 3. Potential SO2 emissions of bituminous coal that was mined in the Appalachian basin for electrical power generation for 1983 through 1995 8 4. Potential SO2 emissions of bituminous coal that was mined in the Appalachian basin for electrical power generation for 1996 through 2005 9 5–13. Graphs showing— 5. Amount of bituminous coal that was mined for electrical power generation from six Appalachian basin counties that exhibited generally increasing production trends 10 6. Amount of bituminous coal that was mined for electrical power generation from two Appalachian basin counties that exhibited generally decreasing production trends 11 7. Amount of bituminous coal that was mined for electrical power generation from six Appalachian basin counties that exhibited fluctuating production trends 12 8. Sulfur content of bituminous coal that was mined for electrical power generation from six Appalachian basin counties that exhibited generally increasing production trends 13 9. Sulfur content of bituminous coal that was mined for electrical power generation from two Appalachian basin counties that exhibited generally decreasing production trends 14 10. Sulfur content of bituminous coal that was mined for electrical power generation from six Appalachian basin counties that exhibited fluctuating production trends 15 11. Potential SO2 emissions based on sulfur percentages of coal that was mined for electrical power generation from six Appalachian basin counties that exhibited generally increasing production trends 16 12. Potential SO2 emissions based on sulfur percentages of coal that was mined for electrical power generation from two Appalachian basin counties that exhibited generally decreasing production trends 17

Appalachian basin bituminous coal: sulfur content and potential sulfur dioxide emissions of coal mined for electrical power generation