English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

3 Introduction  3 Data from eight creepmeters closest to the earthquake  5 Rainfall effects and creep retardation  6 Coseismic steps and static stress changes  8 Creep rate changes and static stress changes  10 Coefficient of apparent friction  12 Creep rate vs. stress law  12 Models exploring depth-origin of Loma Prieta afterslip  16 Retardation and anomalous behavior before the earthquake?  17 Conclusions  19 Acknowledgments  20 Appendix A: Site notes  20 References cited  23 Table Captions  29 Tables  31 Figures  37 1 This report has been submitted to "The Loma Prieta, California, earthquake of October 17, 1989 postseismic effects, aftershocks, and other phenomena: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1550-D (in preparation)." RESPONSE OF U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CREEPMETERS IN CENTRAL CALIFORNIA TO THE OCTOBER 18,1989 LOMA PRIETA EARTHQUAKE By K.S. Breckenridge andR.W. Simpson

Response of U.S. Geological Survey creepmeters in central California to the October 18, 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake