English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

2005 Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Figure 2. Graph showing the interim loss rate of material to the nearshore for each of the three landslide sites. Figure 3. Oblique aerial photographs of the three study areas. Figure 4. Loss/gain distribution maps for the three landslide sites showing the areas for each analysis period where there has been a loss or gain of material within the landslide complex. List of Tables Table 1. Statistics of the error in the grids used to conduct the analysis. Table 2. Net loss, area and loss rate for each of the landslide sites.

Decadal-scale analysis of coastal landslides along the Big Sur coast: Rates and processes