z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
“Wrong, but It Worked”: How Lay Citizens Assess the Ethics of Communicating about Risk in the Context of Local Scientific/Technological Controversy
Author(s) -
Andrew R. Binder
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
iowa state university summer symposium on science communication
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.31274/sciencecommunication-180809-27
Subject(s) - context (archaeology) , engineering ethics , computer science , epistemology , knowledge management , political science , sociology , engineering , philosophy , history , archaeology
Much communication research suggests that disputes over scientific controversy are rooted in personal values and ethics. This study investigates these ideas through citizens’ evaluations of communication ethics during an emerging controversy. Findings reveal a few prominent ethical themes citizens rely on to make moral judgments about science and risk communication.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom