English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Research on attributes and training outcomes suggests that employees with positive attitudes have better job performance and involvement in the workplace. As the training environment has changed from teacher-centered to learner-centered, both trainers and trainees are responsible for training efficiency. The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors that contribute to being an effective trainer. This research also provided suggestions to help employers and managers effectively select trainers who could increase training efBciency and productivity and reduce production costs. An attribute rating scale of 66 items was developed to select potential trainers from current employees. A survey was then conducted with the manufacturing industry in the state of Iowa. T-tests were used to show the differences between trainers and manufacturing employees, and differences between male and female employees. A factor analysis was conducted with 205 usable responses to identify those factors that contribute significant differences among employee attributes. Following the factor analysis, an ANOVA was adapted to determine the relationships between the independent variables (i.e., status, gender, education level, field, work experience, and experience in training) and dependent variables (i.e., interpersonal skills, behaviors, knowledge and skills, and personalities). Fourteen factors were described which have significant correlations to independent variables. The findings indicated that there are significant differences between trainers and manufacturing employees based on communication skills, relationship orientation, task orientation, insistence, concepts toward training, logical thinking, and self-identity. Also, attribute differences among trainers and manufacturing employees could be attributed to

Developing an attribute rating scale to select employees who display the potential to become effective in-house trainers in manufacturing companies