English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The intent of this study was to build on previous works in an effort to establish new methods and frameworks to help understand why little has changed in faculty scholarship more than twenty years after Scholarship Reconsidered. A premise of this study is that the institutionalization of new domains of faculty scholarship in a university or college is a function of what scholarly domains the faculty are socialized in their departments to conduct. The study revised the instrument used in Institutionalizing a Broader View of Scholarship Through Boyer’s Four Domains, and implemented the new instrument with all full-time faculty at a large, research-intensive, land-grant institution. Interestingly, the demographic analysis of those faculty who want to conduct the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) and the Scholarship of Extension/Professional Practice (SEPP) in the future revealed that these two subsets had little to no differentiation in demographic profile. The most revealing difference was the twenty-eight percentage point difference in the percentage of faculty who are conducting the scholarship of extension/professional practice as opposed to the percentage of faculty who desire to conduct SEPP in the future. It was posited this was due to the perception of what actually constitutes SEPP by Iowa State University faculty. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted on gender with regard to tenure status and rank. The non-tenured status ratio was 2:1 for females (42%) as compared to males (20%). Also in the full dataset, professors were more than three times likely to be male than female. The results from this study held in a statistically significant manner with the literature regarding gender in relation to rank and tenure status.

Socialized scholarship: the role of departmental socialization on the institutionalization of Boyer's scholarship at one large research institution