English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Corn stover provides producers a potential additional market for selling biomass for biomass production. However, corn stover returns nutrients to the soil, decreases soil erosion, and helps maintain soil properties. Long term stover removal has been determined to cause detrimental environmental effects (Wilhelm et al., 1986; Mann et al., 2002; Nelson, 2002). Perennial groundcovers or living mulches grow simultaneously with the main row crop and are maintained as living groundcover throughout the growing season. Groundcovers grown in the interrow of row crops may provide beneficial functions such as weed suppression, water infiltration, nutrient cycling, and carbon inputs, but should not disrupt corn development and productivity. The objective of this research was to evaluate management systems including living mulches grown in continuous corn with stover removal. Corn was planted into three perennial groundcovers: creeping red fescue (CF) (Festuca rubra L.), Kentucky bluegrass (KB) (Poa pratensis L.), and a mixture of creeping red fescue and white clover (MX) (Trifolium repens L.) in 2008 and 2009 near Ames, IA. Management treatments were fall strip tillage (ST) and no-tillage (NT), accompanied with either a pre-planting

Comparing inter-specific competition for continuous corn grown in a living mulch with stover removal