English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is increasingly used in protracted intravenous therapy. The device has several advantages for family practice, but its use has been chiefly described in nursing and interventional radiology literature. We investigated the use of the PICC in a family practice teaching hospital.Forty PICCs were inserted from 1993 to 1995 in 29 patients. Available records and radiographs were reviewed for indication, nature of placement attempts, indwelling time, PICC role in therapy, and attendant complications.Successful placement was achieved in 95 percent of instances requiring PICC use. Fluoroscopically guided placement, usually without venography, was found to be preferable to unguided bedside placement. In a few cases in which PICCs were placed, no other access was subsequently required to complete therapy. Few clinically serious complications were encountered. Most complications were related to placement at bedside.Our experience supports the PICC as a minimally invasive, economical alternative for protracted intravenous therapy. Fluoroscopically guided placement was found preferable to unguided bedside placement. Physicians ordering or placing PICCs should understand fully how to assess placement.

Peripherally inserted central catheters: placement and use in a family practice hospital.