English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

It is a widely accepted belief in natural language processing research that naturally occurring data is the best (and perhaps the only appropriate) data for testing text mining systems. This paper compares code coverage using a suite of functional tests and using a large corpus and finds that higher class, line, and branch coverage is achieved with structured tests than with even a very large corpus.

Software testing and the naturally occurring data assumption in natural language processing