English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Coordinations in noun phrases often pose the problem that elliptified parts have to be reconstructed for proper semantic interpretation. Unfortunately, the detection of coordinated heads and identification of elliptified elements notoriously lead to ambiguous reconstruction alternatives. While linguistic intuition suggests that semantic criteria might play an important, if not superior, role in disambiguating resolution alternatives, our experiments on the reannotated WSJ part of the Penn Treebank indicate that solely morpho-syntactic criteria are more predictive than solely lexico-semantic ones. We also found that the combination of both criteria does not yield any substantial improvement.

Are morpho-syntactic features more predictive for the resolution of noun phrase coordination ambiguity than lexico-semantic similarity scores?