English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

It is not a rare phenomenon for human written text to use non-restrictive NP modifiers to express essential pieces of information or support the situation presented in the main proposition containing the NP, for example, "Private Eye, which couldn't afford the libel payment, had been threatened with closure." (from Wall Street Journal) Yet no previous research in NLG investigates this in detail. This paper describes corpus analysis and a psycholinguistic experiment regarding the acceptability of using non-restrictive NP modifiers to express semantic relations that might normally be signalled by 'because' and 'then'. The experiment tests several relevant factors and enables us to accept or reject a number of hypotheses. The results are incorporated into an NLG system based on a Genetic Algorithm.

An empirical analysis of constructing non-restrictive NP modifiers to express semantic relations