English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this text, the author examines the historical aspects of constitutional complaint, analyzes the genesis of its implementation in legal systems, firstly, in the states representing Western democracies. Furthermore, it seeks to answer the question of whether constitutional complaint is properly detected as a legal remedy or a remedy. It should be borne in mind that the definitive definition arises and is ultimately determined by the position of the constitutional court in the system of state power. Special attention is paid to the attempt to implement constitutional complaint and the legal order of the Republic of Macedonia. The author, through a brief review, carries out a critical analysis of the constituent elements of constitutional complaint that the new one predicts Draft amendment to amend the Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia. Particular attention is drawn to paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Draft Amendment XXXIX from the aspect of the negative impact they have on the position of the Constitutional Court, displacing it from the primary base with implementation and regular appeal.

Constitutional appeal – human rights protection procedure - with particular reference to the constitutional complaint in the Republic of Macedonia