English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In recent years there have been numerous computational studies predicting the nature of cold-compressed graphite yielding a proverbial alphabet soup of carbon structures (e.g., bct-C4, K4-, M-, H-, R-, S-, T-, W- and Z-carbon). Although theoretical methods have improved, the inherent nature of graphite (i.e., low-Z) and the subsequent room-temperature, high-pressure phase transition (i.e., low symmetry, nanocrystalline and sluggish), make experimental measurements difficult to execute and interpret even with the current technology of 3rd generation synchrotron sources. The room-temperature, high-pressure phase transition of graphite has been detected by numerous kinds of experiments over the past fifty years, such as electrical resistance measurements, optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, inelastic X-ray scattering, and Raman spectroscopy. However, the identification and characterization of high-pressure graphite is replete with controversy since its discovery more than fifty years ago. Recent experiments confirm that this phase has a monoclinic structure, consistent with the M-carbon phase predicted by theoretical computations. Meanwhile, experiments demonstrate that the phase transition is sluggish and kinetics is important in discerning the phase boundary. Additionally, the post-graphite phase appears to be superhard with hardness comparable to that of diamond.

From soft to superhard: Fifty years of experiments on cold-compressed graphite