English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper is devoted to comparative analysis of numerical methods accuracy. Comparative estimation of accuracy is performed for numerical methods presented as solvers integrated to open sotware package OpenFOAM. Three different OpenFOAM solvers are selected to numerically solve the problem of supersonic flow around a cone. The angle of attack, cone half-angle and Mach number were varied in the selected ranges with a certain step. This approach is implemented using a generalized computational experiment that allows, based on parallel technologies, the simultaneous solution of the same basic problem with different input parameters. A number of test calculations were carried out. The deviation fields of gas-dynamic quantities for all solvers are analyzed. The construction of a generalized computational experiment made it possible to compare the accuracy of the considered solvers not only for one, separately taken problem, but for a class of problems specified by the ranges of variation of the determining parameters. Such an assessment of accuracy can be very useful for users of the software package when choosing a solver. Also, the results obtained can be useful for solver developers.

Analysis of the behavior of OpenFOAM solvers for 3D problem of supersonic flow around a cone at an angle of attack