English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Patio and pavilion, understood as archetypes, may appear as opposing principles in the construction of space. However, we can see through the analysis of some of the proposed cases that the overlap of these principles takes place very frequently, because they both arise from the need to delimit the vacuum by giving to it the character of space. The vacuum is not space, although space may be empty. The vacuum exists without us, whereas space does not. The architect, in designing enclosed space, encapsulates a portion of the vacuum, indistinct and formless, understood as Nature. This is a fragment of Paradise that everyone has right to possess, by binding an idea to the image of the patio and pavilion. From their combined use, there are several cases in which these elements take shape in architectural projects. In some projects, one principle dominates the other, but it is evident that there are a large variety of mixed proposals between the two extremes. The two principles do not exclude one another and can coexist together in a complementary way by appearing in the same project. The two figures as archetypes are taken as the main reference points of different poles that seem to be conflicting and irreconcilable ideas, but that instead build together the complexity of architecture. Full | empty, outside | inside, empty space | full-space, stereotomic | tectonic, vertical | horizontal, centrifugal | centripetal, works together to build space. Using this theoretical and practical approach, we analyse two "classic" works of modern architecture: the Pavilion in Barcelona by Mies and Ville Savoye by Le Corbusier, which both utilize pavilions and patios. The Pompeian house, physically known by LC in his travels and by Mies through its relationship with classicism, constitutes a common point from which the architecture of these masters branches off and reveals an unexpected hybrid synthesis.

Vacuum Appropriation Strategies between Patio and Pavilion Archetypes Hybridization in Two Classical Masters Works of Modern Architecture