English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this study aims to compare the performance of several classification algorithms namely C4.5, Random Forest, SVM, and naive bayes. Research data in the form of JISC participant data amounting to 200 data. Training data amounted to 140 (70%) and testing data amounted to 60 (30%). Classification simulation using data mining tools in the form of rapidminer. The results showed that . In the C4.5 algorithm obtained accuracy of 86.67%. Random Forest algorithm obtained accuracy of 83.33%. In SVM algorithm obtained accuracy of 95%. Naive Bayes' algorithm obtained an accuracy of 86.67%. The highest algorithm accuracy is in SVM algorithm and the smallest is in random forest algorithm

Perbandingan Akurasi, Recall, dan Presisi Klasifikasi pada Algoritma C4.5, Random Forest, SVM dan Naive Bayes