English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This review sought to identify the evolution of the physiotherapeutic evaluation concept since its official publication in the first version of the physiotherapeutic practice guide in 1999 and the elements of the evaluation that frame a differential factor in neurorehabilitation. The data collection was done through a bibliographic review, where the evaluation was identified as a process of analysis in international referents as well as a key step that comes after the examination and before the formulation of the physiotherapeutic diagnosis. The evaluation process has evolved from decision making based on clinical data to phenomenological analysis of the movement. Evaluation occurs at the beginning of the assistance and continues throughout the assistance process to determine individual response to interventions and progress toward identified outcomes. The evaluation concept is broadened only by ratifying its importance, but it does not focus on the process itself. The evaluation process is not reported explicitly in the literature. Nevertheless, it was conceived as the interpretation process performed by physiotherapists using the conclusions made from analyzing the elements of the human movement system, especially those related to the modulating element and to specific neurorehabilitation areas. Evaluation and assessment are synonyms, the subtle but significant difference between them is that evaluation should not be left in the judgment process, it should advance up to the decision making. The evaluation in interdisciplinary neurorehabilitation interventions is a point of meeting and differentiation that allows an integral approach to patients, with emphasis on motor learning considering the patient’s context.

Importancia del proceso de evaluación fisioterapéutica en neurorehabilitación