English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A characteristic feature of the modern Ukrainian state is that for more than a quarter of a century Ukraine has been in the process of continuous reform of all branches of legislation, state executive bodies, certain areas of state executive power, local self-government bodies, administrative structure, public service and other institutions. It is apparent that the goal of any reform should be qualitative changes in the sphere of public life, in which the corresponding reform is being introduced. Prior to the announcement of the start of the reform, it is necessary to carry out global preparatory work on the economic, sociological and legal analysis of the practical necessity of the declared reform and specific projected results of its completion, indicating clearly defined deadlines for their onset. Should the desired changes as a result of the reform do not occur, the reform should be recognised as unsuccessful. Having analysed the stages of judicial reform and the reform of the State Enforcement Service of Ukraine, it can be asserted that the initiators of the reform of the judicial and executive branches of government were primarily interested in two things: 1) the reform process itself, which is accompanied by huge financial costs at the expense of taxpayers and various donor organizations and international funds, and the huge human resource involved, which ensures the direct reform process; and 2) the desire of each new political elite that has come to power in a democratic and legal way to change the state management elite as a means to achieve political goals. The reform of the State Enforcement Service is closely connected with judicial reform, since the activities of this particular system of state bodies are closely connected with the activities of the judicial branch, not only by their consistency and logic, but also by their content component. In the procedural law of Ukraine, enforcement proceedings are considered to be the last stage of judicial proceedings and the final stage of the justice process. It is commonly known that the very fact of making a court decision (meaning a court decision in the broad sense of the word: judgment, ruling,

CERTAIN FEATURES OF THE REFORM OF STATE POWER IN UKRAINIAN WAY