English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

objective: (1) Differences between the effects of circuit and fartlek training method on VO2Max; (2) Differences between the effects of high and low peak expiratory flow on VO2Max; and (3) The interactions between circuit, fartlek exercise methods and peak expiratory flow (high and low) on VO2Max. 2 x 2 factorial method. Peak expiratory flow instruments: peak flow meter and VO2Max: multistage fitness test. ANAVA data analysis α = 0.05. Results. (1) There is a significant difference between the effects of circuit and fartlek exercise methods on VO2Max, p value = 0.022 < 0.05, which show that circuit training method is objectively better than fartlek training method. (2) There is a significant difference between the effects of high and low peak expiratory flow on VO2Max, p value = 0.000 < 0.05, students with high expiratory volume achive higher value than those with low expiratory volume. (3) There is a significant interaction between circuit and fartlek training method and (high and low) peak expiratory flow on VO2Max, p value = 0.000 < 0.05 Keywords—circuit training method, fartlek, VO2Max

proceedings of the 2nd yogyakarta international seminar on health, physical education, and sport science (yishpess 2018) and 1st conference on interdisciplinary approach in sports (cois 2018)

The Effects of Circuit and Fartlek Exercise Method and Peak Expiratory Flow on Vo2max