English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

As a negative cultural administration phenomenon, non-action exists at all times and in all countries. In ancient China, to fight against non-action is mainly based on the idea of “ruling by man”, supplemented by the idea of “ruling by law”, through the election system and the imperial examination system to select government officials and talents who have ability and political integrity and make a difference; to examine officials’ performance through performance appraisal as the core of the test system; to punish or derogate the one who holds onto his job while failing to fulfill his responsibility, who has non-action and doesn’t have any actual performance on the basis of the examination results so as to encourage government officials to take a positive action; to supervise the government officials’ power and actions and to punish their illegal acts through independent institutions, rigorous system and a weighted ancient supervisory system. Western countries govern the non-action behavior in strict accordance with the law and the civil service system and build up the civil servant system on the basis of “rule by law”, which provides protection of the legal system for western countries to govern the non-action performance. Since the 18th National People’s Congress of Communist Party of China, in the context of running the party strictly and with the release of the eight-point regulations, the state has stepped up great efforts to fight corruption, especially the accountability system for leading cadres is gradually established and implemented. A small number of government employees either do not or are unable to fulfill their duties, or behave irresponsibly as the main feature of non-action behavior, the subjective performance as “mediocre administration”, “sloth administration” and “inactive administration”, the concrete performance as the following six non-action phenomena “make fashion characterized by asking for stability while avoiding risks; sing tune by shouting slogans while doing nothing; dawdle by being reconciled to the situation while being mediocre and incompetent; roundabout by evading contradictions when confronting problems; throw up the job when they suffer hardships and dangers and are unable to bear the burden; cover up the truth by deceiving their superiors and deluding their subordinates”29TPP29T. Non-action behavior as a negative energy cultural administration phenomenon spread in the leading cadres at all levels, is bound to affect the working enthusiasm of overall national civil servants in the point of current social and economic reform, if we do not treat it on time or allow its development, which will exert a bad influence on the team building of civil servants in our country, and then seriously affect the social and economic development. The non-action behavior of some leading cadres is no longer a negative cultural administrative phenomenon to current society in China, Derivatives as the traditional bureaucratic system brings at all times and in all countries. Efforts to prevent and control non-action have also been an important content of the management system at all times and in all countries. After thousands of years of history accumulating, China and overseas countries have accumulated a lot of valuable experience worthy of learning. 3rd International Conference on Management, Education Technology and Sports Science (METSS 2016) © 2016. The authors Published by Atlantis Press 296 1. The content of governing non-action in ancient China includes: ensuring the leading role of “rule by man” supplemented by “rule by law” as the ancient officials management system To run the state well, we must run the government officials well first. Government officials are the basic outline of people, which is the consensus of many politicians in history. The legitimate political system of feudal monarchy determines that ancient China must be “rule by man” , and in ancient dogmatic system, the implementation of “rule by man” is the core of the “government official”. More than 5000 years of Chinese civilization, the management system of China officials which regards government officials as the core of the system has a long history, from the main officials selection system represented by the election system and the imperial examination system to the official examination system represented by examining the courses, and then to the disciplinary system to monitor the official, all of these constitute the complete system of official management system for the ancient China to prevent and control of the non-action behavior. In the official management system of the Chinese traditional “ruling by rites”, “ruling by virtue” and “ruling by humanity” and “ruling by man” thought has always been dominant, and “rule by law” is always in a secondary position. 1.1 Government official selecting system represented by recommendation and interview system and imperial examination system, aims to choose talents with integrity and ability. 1.1.1 Recommendation and interview system VS regulation over non-action. Select government officials through recommendation of talent personnel to participate in state governance. It is a bottom-up recommendation system, established by Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty in the first year of Yuang Guang. Strictly, the recommendation and interview system in Han Dynasty began from Emperor Wen, who ordered that “recommending talents who are integrity and straight to give advice”, and set up “interview institution” (examination institution). It is featured by recommendation and examination before recruiting. 1.1.2 Imperial examination system VS regulation over non-action. Select government officials with ability and integrity through examination to participate in state governance. First introduced in the Northern and Southern Dynasties, this system establishes and develops through Sui Dynasty, Tang Dynasty, and Song Dynasty, and continues to hold place in Yuan Dynasty, Ming Dynasty and Qing Dynasty. During its 1300 years history, it has helped the feudal rulers choose numerous loyal, honest and upright officials, playing a positive role in effectively arranging feudal politic activities. In this examination system, subjects are chosen by the government, and scholars may take the examination without any restraints. The choice of officials depends on their examination performance, which is the major characteristic of imperial examination system 29TPP29T. With public examination and selection through exam results, it becomes the major approach to recruit officials in the middle and later period of feudal society in China, which symbolizes that China’s way of selecting officials has been the most objective and fairest one that human society can achieve at that time since the middle period of feudal society. The common characteristic of the recommendation and interview system and the imperial examination system which has been existing for more the 1300 years, is that talents are selected through recommendation and examination or imperial examination. That is “selecting talents with ability and integrity”, which are the crucial criteria for the recruitment. In other words, those talents are strictly selected before they become government officials. Therefore, it ensures people who are lack of capability will not be in the government office, while those selected ones can resist corruption, devote to governance, love people, give full play of their talent, and make achievements, safeguarding the interest and power of the ruling class. 1.2 This appraisal system central by performance evaluation focuses on the performance of officials. And the evaluation result is the foundation for punishment and delegation of those officials who neglect their duties, or do not perform well, so as to promote government officials to carry out their duties. 1.2.1 The specification of appraisal institution. In ancient China, the appraisal institution is also called the institute for performance evaluation

The Experiences of Fighting against Non-action at All Times and in All Countries